Today we’re going after one of the most famous theorems of algebraic geometry: the Riemann-Roch Theorem. For it, we depart the world of general schemes and return to varieties. And not just any varieties, but nonsingular complete curves.

The reason we need nonsingularity is because we’re going to be working with divisors and line bundles. Specifically, we’ll be needing linear systems and the canonical divisor. We’ll go through the proof, because I feel like it, but it isn’t really all that illuminating. Here we go.

**Riemann-Roch Theorem**: Let be a divisor on a curve of genus . Then we have .

Now, we stop a moment and say that .

*Proof*: Now, is the divisor associated to the sheaf . Now, all curves are projective (in fact, all curves can be embedded in ) so we have Serre Duality, which says that the global sections of this sheaf are dual to . So we need to show that where .

So we’ll proceed by induction. We start with , which means that . So and , because this is Serre dual to , which is the number of independent 1-forms on the curve, which is a definition of the genus. It can be shown to work with our definition via the Hilbert polynomial, but it’s a bit trickier. So the formula is then , so it’s good.

Now we take to be any divisor, a point, and show that the formula holds for if and only if it does for . Then we’re done, because anything can be built from 0 in finitely many steps of adding or subtracting a point. Now, we denote by the structure sheaf of the point. That is, we have a map , and have the direct image of the point’s structure sheaf.

So there’s a short exact sequence . We tensor with and get a sequence . Euler characteristic adds in short exact sequences (check this yourself, it’s pretty straightforward) and we get , and . So the formula holds for iff it does for . QED

Now, that’s a big theorem. It’s really important. Let’s use it to prove a fun theorem.

Let be an smooth curve which is not complete. Then it’s affine. Why should this be true? Well, we first embed into a complete curve. Now, there are finitely many points in . Look at the divisor . We can choose the to all be positive and to be sufficiently large that there is a regular function such that and it is finite everywhere else. We get this out of Riemann-Roch, by noting that for , we have , and so we have the formula . So there is some function on which is meromorphic and has poles exactly at of order at worst and nowhere else.

Now, we use the linear system defined by to embed into projective space. One thing that this accomplishes is that the divisor becomes a hyperplane section, with the ‘s being the intersection multiplicity. So we have for some hyperplane. Removing the hyperplane, and we turn into , and still have embedded as a closed subvariety. Thus, it is affine.

That’s all for now, next time, we will think a bit about surfaces.

August 7, 2008 at 9:01 am

[...] 7, 2008 Now, the way that the Riemann-Roch theorem was phrased before, the geometry wasn’t obvious. We had to extract it in terms of rational [...]

February 10, 2009 at 10:27 am

[...] talk about is the Riemann Roch Theorem. You may wonder why, since it has already been discussed here , but there have been vast generalizations of this theorem throughout the last century. I want to [...]