Today we’re back to some material from the first post in this series, and going to prove an actual theorem about vector bundles. Next time, we’ll be getting into the heart of the paper, and that may be my last post on B-N-R.
For this post, we’ll fix a smooth, irreducible curve , we want
, and we want
for
. We start with some constructions. Let
, and set
the natural projection. Then we have a natural relatively ample line bundle
on
, which has
on
. Because the pushforward has a natural section
, we get a section of
, which we call
.
Similarly, we have that , which has a natural section
, which gives us a section
of
.
Now, we define a polynomial which is a section of
. We denote the zero set of this by
, and it is a curve in
. Restricting
to
, we get a finite morphism of curves
. In fact, it is an
-sheeted ramified cover.
Let’s say we want to be integral. Can we do that? Well, we have
. We can show that the set of these where
is integral is open by noting that not being reduced and not being irreducible will both be closed conditions: we can write down equations that check them. It remains to check that the set of these is nonempty. To do that, we look at
for
, and choose
so that
isn’t equivalent to
for any
. If we can do this, then we have
integral, and so get a nonempty open set such.
From now on, we assume that is integral. We’re going to give a second construction of
, by working backwards from what we have. It’s a fact that
and $V(y)$ are disjoint, and so
is nowhere vanishing. Now, a line bundle with a nowhere vanishing section is trivial, so
is the trivial line bundle. Similarly, we can check that
is a section of
. Now, if we push forward the structure sheaf of
, we get
. This is isomorphic to
, where
is the ideal given by the image of the map
by taking the sum of the maps
. If we do this, then we get that
.
As an aside, we can calculate the genus of . We start with the fact that
. But that will just be
, then apply Riemann-Roch, and note that what you just calculated was
, and you get that teh genus is
.
That was a tangent, now we prove the first real result we have about vector bundles:
Theorem: Let be a smooth curve,
a set of sections such that
is integral. Then there exists a canonical bijection between torsion free sheaves of rank 1 on
and pairs
of a rank
vector bundle
on
and a twisted endomorphism
of
such that the characteristic coefficients are the
.
In fact, if is smooth, we can say line bundles.
Proof: Let be a torsion free sheaf of rank 1 on
. Then
is a vector bundle of rank
. Additionally, it comes with the structure of a
-module. Conversely, a vector bundle of rank
on
,
which has
-module structure, defines a sheaf
on
because
is an affine morphism, and we’ll have
. The integrality of
will guarantee that
is torsion free of rank 1.
Now, we have an -algebra,
, and so being a
-module is the same as a homomorphism
, which is the same as a map
such that the polynomial defined by the
, called
, has
.
Now, as is integral, we have that
is irreducible over
, which means it must be the characteristic polynomial of
. So given
torsion free of rank 1, we’ve constructed the pair. All that remains is that for each pair we get a torsion free sheaf, and we’ve got it for vector bundles with
-module structure. We just showed that that structure is the same as have
with has
, and so if we assume that the characteristic coefficients of
are the
, we get
by Cayley-Hamilton, finishing the proof.
.
September 22, 2009 at 11:34 am
[...] restrict even further to an open set where the spectral curve is smooth and irreducible. By the theorem from last time, we have that consists of pairs where is a stable bundle coming from the direct [...]
December 9, 2009 at 5:44 am
I have a question about this. If X and Y are algebraic curves and f : Y -> X is a finite proper morphism (e.g. X and Y are compact Riemann surfaces and Y is an m:1 cover of X), then why is the pushforward f_*L of any line bundle L->Y a locally-free sheaf on X? Essentially, this comes down to the behavior at branch points, but I can’t see why f_*L is necessarily free in the vicinity of each and every branch point. Do you have any thoughts on this?
March 22, 2010 at 1:26 pm
Why does the integrality of X_s guarantee that M is torsion-free?
Why does this integrality and the irreducibility of P_s over k(X) guarantee that P_s is the characteristic polynomial of \phi?
March 24, 2010 at 8:17 pm
For comment 2: Locally, a branch point is
on
. Try computing the pushforward of
along the
th power map to see what happens.
For comment 3: We know that
is a polynomial that
satisfies. Irreducibility then implies it is the minimal polynomial, and degree implies characteristic polynomial. As for your first point, I don’t have a proof off the top of my head, nor a quick reference.