Comments for Rigorous Trivialities
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com
Sat, 13 May 2017 06:43:04 +0000hourly1http://wordpress.com/Comment on Gradings of Rings and Modules by Francisco Palmios
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/gradings-of-rings-and-modules/#comment-12378
Sat, 13 May 2017 06:43:04 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/08/gradings-of-rings-and-modules/#comment-12378Richard Ellenbogen Plastic Surgeon
]]>Comment on The Veronese Embedding by Anonymous
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/the-veronese-embedding/#comment-12341
Fri, 12 May 2017 05:10:08 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/the-veronese-embedding/#comment-12341What is the map $\phi$ supposed to be?
]]>Comment on Schemes by Varieties and Schemes Revisited | Theories and Theorems
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/05/21/schemes/#comment-12100
Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:10:40 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=133#comment-12100[…] Schemes on Rigorous Trivialities […]
]]>Comment on Abstract Varieties by Varieties and Schemes Revisited | Theories and Theorems
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/03/04/abstract-varieties/#comment-12099
Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:10:37 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-12099[…] Abstract Varieties on Rigorous Trivialities […]
]]>Comment on Sheaves by Rena
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/29/sheaves/#comment-12082
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:46:11 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=79#comment-12082The purhcases I make are entirely based on these articles.
]]>Comment on Proper Maps and (Quasi) Projective Varieties by Bertie
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2009/02/10/proper-maps-and-quasi-projective-varieties/#comment-12081
Thu, 30 Mar 2017 04:35:57 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=828#comment-12081I have exactly what info I want. Check, please. Wait, it’s free? Awoesme!
]]>Comment on The Veronese Embedding by Anonymous
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/the-veronese-embedding/#comment-12079
Wed, 29 Mar 2017 07:42:30 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/01/14/the-veronese-embedding/#comment-12079I feel a bit confused. If I understand correctly the degree of the Veronese variety v_2(P^2) is 4. On the other hand, if you intersect v_2(P^2) with a line in P^5 you will get 3 points. Where is the problem ? (or maybe there is no problem : but for me if a variety has degree d this mean that the intersection with a plane of complementary dimension gives precisely d points. Maybe I am mistaken).
]]>Comment on Representable Functors by Samantha
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/07/16/representable-functors/#comment-12062
Tue, 07 Mar 2017 21:17:46 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=183#comment-12062I apologize for leaving such a trivial comment, but might it be as simple as saying that Ext is the first derivative of Hom? Which isn’t even that dishonest; it’s linguistic.
]]>Comment on Riemann-Roch Theorem for Curves by More on Sheaves | Theories and Theorems
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/06/03/riemann-roch-theorem-for-curves/#comment-11975
Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:05:52 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=137#comment-11975[…] Riemann-Roch Theorem for Curves by Charles Siegel on Rigorous Trivialities […]
]]>Comment on Differential Forms and the Canonical Bundle by More on Sheaves | Theories and Theorems
https://rigtriv.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/differential-forms-and-the-canonical-bundle/#comment-11974
Wed, 01 Mar 2017 08:05:50 +0000http://rigtriv.wordpress.com/?p=101#comment-11974[…] Differential Forms and the Canonical Bundle by Charles Siegel on Rigorous Trivialities […]
]]>