Dear Readers,
Today we begin by talking about elliptic curves. We define an elliptic curve to be an abstract nonsingular genus one curve over a field with a given rational point. I’m told the theory of genus one curves without rational points is perhaps even more interesting than that of elliptic curves, but that may or may not be a topic for the future(when I know more about them)
Usually when one talks about elliptic curves, they talk about them in terms of Weierstrass equations, and it was shown that we can do so in a previous post. As such, we speak equally of an elliptic curve as an abstract nonsingular complete curve of genus one with a distinguished rational point
and as the zero set of a homogeneous degree 3 polynomial
which is unique up to a very specific set of coordinate changes, which we will detail in further posts, particularly when it comes to the reduction map for elliptic curves.
We now show that the chord and tangent group law given in the earlier post on elliptic curves coincides with the group of divisors of degree 0 mod the principal divisors, which we denote .
Let (i.e. the cubic flex of the Weierstrass equation, although we could take it to be any point on the curve whatsoever) be the distinguished rational point of
. We make a map from
by
. This is in fact a group homomorphism. Let
be rational points on
and
denote the line in
connecting
. Let
denote the third point of intersection with
dictated by Bezout’s Theorem. Let
be the line in
connecting
and call the similar third point of intersection
(the addition of the two points in the tangent-and-chord group law). It suffices then to show that
and
are equivalent up to the divisor of a rational function and we give it explicitly. Since
are lines, they are the zero sets of linear forms
and
. Thus
gives a well-defined rational function on
. The divisor of this function is
. This shows that
and thus our map is a group homomorphism.
This homomorphism is surjective. If we let be a divisor of degree 0, then
is a divisor of degree 1. Since
has genus 1, by Riemann-Roch, the
-dimension of
is 1, and so we can pick
so that
. Thus we consider the divisor of
in the sense of this post,
. Since
,
is an effective divisor of degree 1 and is thus 1 times a point
. Hence
is equivalent to
.
Finally we check injectivity. Suppose there were two rational points on ,
and
such that a rational function
with the property
. Then
is an effective divisor of degree 1, so
is effective and thus
is a nonzero constant function and
for all points
. Therefore
, i.e.
and
cannot be distinct.
This (as with most things with elliptic curves) is the base case of a general phenomenon with other varieties. Let be a curve of genus
with a rational point
. The Jacobian variety of
is a
-dimensional variety with a group structure isomorphic to
. This is variety can be constructed over any arbitrary field if one is willing to sit down and ask some difficult questions such as, “Why should
copies of the curve modded out by the symmetric group
be a nonsingular variety of dimension
?” and “Why should a functor corresponding to points of that variety up to some sort of equivalence be representable?” I will not attempt to answer these questions here today, but will instead refer the reader to chapter 3 of James Milne’s online book on Abelian Varieties.
I will instead restrict myself to working over the complex numbers where we can consider a projective curve as a compact Riemann surface of genus and have more tools to play with. Consider
be the space of holomorphic 1-forms on
. We can make a subset of elements of the dual space called the periods of
by sending a 1-form
to
where
is a closed path on
. If there are two closed paths
where
where
is a closed subsurface of
then
on
because closed 1-forms are exact and hence
. Thus the periods of a Riemann surface
depend only on the homology class of
, so the periods are in correspondence with
, so we call the set of periods
the period lattice. We call
the Jacobian of the curve.
But wait, why would this have a group structure isomorphic to ? Recall that on
we have a distinguished rational point(well now that we are in the complex numbers, every point is rational)
and so we can, for every point
choose a path
starting at
and ending at
. Thus we have a map
called the Abel-Jacobi map. This map extends to divisors of
and in particular to divisors of degree zero. It is a theorem of Jacobi that the map
extending the Abel-Jacobi map is surjective and it is a theorem of (you guessed it) Abel that the kernel of
is the set of principal divisors.
Next time I will move on to morphisms between curves, isogenies, dual isogenies and things of that sort.
Very interesting!
I wonder where you heard the rumor that a genus one curve without a rational point is at least as interesting as a genus one curve with a rational point…but the following seems to me to be a pretty solid proof of it.
If C is a genus one curve over k without a rational point, then Pic^0(C) is a genus one curve over k with a rational point, which is (among other things), isomorphic to the original curve C when C itself has a k-rational point.
However this association is in general far from being one-to-one: the set of all genus one curves C with Pic^0(C) isomorphic (as a variety together with a Pic^0(C)-action) to a given elliptic curve is called the WC-group of Pic^0(C), which is in general a big (infinite) abelian group.
A similar, but simpler, argument works nicely to show that arithmetic geometry — i.e., study of algebraic varieties over not necessarily algebraically closed fields — must be at least as interesting as algebraic geometry.
Pingback: Symposium “Abel Prize 2010” « Disquisitiones Mathematicae
Great beat ! I wish to apprentice while you amend your website,
how could i subscribe for a blog site? The account helped me
a acceptable deal. I had been a little bit acquainted of this your broadcast
offered bright clear idea